god? :: essays research papers

Many people have tried to prove through many counsels that divinity fudge exists. Anselm used the ontological argument, proposing that if divinity fudge could be thought of and perceived, accordingly God has to exist. At the center of the ontological argument is the idea or concept of mankind. The ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. "Ontological" means talking about being and so in the Philosophy case, that being is the existence or being of God. The ontological argument differs from other arguments in favor of God because of the fact that it is an a priori deductive argument, a priori means that a mortal arguing this can reach a certain conclusion by the use of reason and non proof. A deductive argument means that if the expound that are put into the argument are true, then the conclusion mustiness be true. Thus, Anselm tends to base his argument on the definitions and the terms that he used.Anselms origina l form of the argument is that God is "that than which none greater can be conceived" (45) . Firstly, it must be emphasised that Anselms definition does not limit God to being the "greatest" but Anselem makes it distinguishn that nothing greater can be thought than God himself. Therefore, God should not in any way be linked to terms such as omnipotent as terminology such as this limit him to what he really is. With this definition, Anselem tries to prove that not only does God exist in the mind but also in reality. He is saying that Because God is something and can be perceived, God must exist. Another way of stating this is that God is perfect so he must exist because he would not be perfect if he didnt exist. Anselm uses the example of "the frig around" to prove his point on Gods existence. He says that when "the fool" says that "There is no God" in the Psalms, he must therefore find what he hears , and what he understands in his language by the term "God". Therefore, if he knows what God is, God must exist as it is impossible to know what something is if it does not exist. The atheist, as Anselm points out, is able to understand the phrase "being than which none greater can be thought." He concludes that if an atheist can understand this, then God is in the atheists understanding.